On 10/16/2017 01:07 PM, Michael Lyle wrote:

Jens--

Thanks for your patience.

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Jens Axboe [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 10/16/2017 11:34 AM, Michael Lyle wrote:

quoted

Sorry this got through to linux-block, was detected by the kbuilds test
robot.  NSEC_PER_SEC is a long constant; 2.5 * 10^9 doesn't fit in a
signed long constant.

Applied, but you should remember to add Fixes lines when a patch
explicitly fixes a problem introduced by a previous patch. Ala:

Fixes: e41166c5c44e ("bcache: writeback rate shouldn't artifically clamp")

so that backports have an easier time finding dependent fixes.

Sorry about that too. I considered the Fixes: tag but didn't know if
the hashes would "hold true" into mainline.  Now I see Linus merges
your tree so the hash should be durable.

They are durable once applied, so yeah.

-- 
Jens Axboe