[...]

quoted

However, you have completely ignored mine, Linus and Bartlomiej's
comments about that we want the blkmq port being a separate patch(es)
and then make the CMDQ patches on top. This worries me, because it
seems like our messages don't reach you.

Rubbish!  I gave a very good reason for keeping the CQE code in - it is
designed to work together.  I also pointed out that it is trivial to see the
CQE code and that it is all '+' lines anyway.

You gave reasons, but none of us bought them.

But not one question in response!  Where is a single example of why it is
difficult like it is.  Where are the questions!  Not even a request for
documentation!  How I am supposed to know what you do or don't understand if
you don't ask any questions! There is no evidence that you guys have read a
single line!

I have and I have also tested it, finding it not working. As reported.

However, I have also told you that I am having a *hard time* to review
it, because it implements both blkmq and CMDQ in the same patch to
code changes get complex.

So, what are your plans for the patches?  What don't you understand?

I have told you this several time, so has Linus and Bartlomiej.

If you can split it up such the blkmq support comes first, then I can
review/test and pick it up.

Kind regards
Uffe