On 10/17/2017 10:09 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:

On 10/16/2017 06:03 PM, Kees Cook wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jens Axboe [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 10/05/2017 05:13 PM, Kees Cook wrote:

quoted

In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
to pass the timer pointer explicitly.

Applied to for-4.15/timer

Hi,

I just wanted to check what your timer plans were for merging this
into -next (I'm doing rebasing to find out which maintainers I need to
resend patches to, and I noticed block hasn't appeared in -next, but I
know you've pulled patches...)

It should be in for-next, since I wrote that email. It's in my
for-4.15/timer branch, which is also merged into my for-next branch
(which is the one that Stephen pulls).

Just pulled in for-next, and it seems to contain what it should.
If you see missing block related timer patches in for-next, then
they haven't been applied to my tree yet.

axboe@dell:[.]home/axboe/git/linux-next $ git log drivers/block/aoe/
commit a79c192c7cdb639ad1b059cedbf3dfa68427a170
Author: Kees Cook [off-list ref]
Date:   Thu Oct 5 16:13:54 2017 -0700

    block/aoe: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
[...]

-- 
Jens Axboe