Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch | linux-block | Ratatoskr

blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Oleksandr Natalenko <hidden> · 2017-07-29
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Oleksandr Natalenko <hidden> · 2017-07-29
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Mike Galbraith <hidden> · 2017-07-30
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Oleksandr Natalenko <hidden> · 2017-07-30
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2017-08-08
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> · 2017-08-08
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Oleksandr Natalenko <hidden> · 2017-08-08
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2017-08-08
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Oleksandr Natalenko <hidden> · 2017-08-08
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Mike Galbraith <hidden> · 2017-08-08
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2017-08-08
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Mike Galbraith <hidden> · 2017-08-08
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Mike Galbraith <hidden> · 2017-08-08
Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> · 2017-08-08

Re: blk-mq breaks suspend even with runtime PM patch

From: Mike Galbraith <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-08 16:51:02
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 09:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:

Should these go back farther than 4.12?  Looks like they apply cleanly
to 4.9, didn't look older than that...

I met prerequisites at 4.11, but I wasn't patching anything remotely
resembling virgin source.

	-Mike