Re: [PATCH 2/8] target: remove iblock WRITE_SAME passthrough support
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-01 06:27:01
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-scsi
Subsystem:
scsi target subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
"Martin K. Petersen", Linus Torvalds
Hey HCH & Jens, Is this already queued up for v4.13 to address the missing LBPRZ feature bit..? If not, I'll happy to take it via target-pending along with the following to re-enable it via max_write_zeroes_sectors.
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
index d2f089c..e7caf78 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ bool target_configure_unmap_from_queue(struct se_dev_attrib *attrib, attrib->unmap_granularity = q->limits.discard_granularity / block_size; attrib->unmap_granularity_alignment = q->limits.discard_alignment / block_size; - attrib->unmap_zeroes_data = 0; + attrib->unmap_zeroes_data = (q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors); return true; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(target_configure_unmap_from_queue);
Any objections..? On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 22:30 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 18:08 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
Use the pscsi driver to support arbitrary command passthrough instead.The people who are actively using iblock_execute_write_same_direct() are doing so in the context of ESX VAAI BlockZero, together with EXTENDED_COPY and COMPARE_AND_WRITE primitives. Just using PSCSI is not an option for them. In practice though I've not seen any users of IBLOCK WRITE_SAME for anything other than VAAI BlockZero, so just using blkdev_issue_zeroout() when available, and falling back to iblock_execute_write_same() if the WRITE_SAME buffer contains anything other than zeros should be OK. How about something like the following below..? This would bring parity to how blkdev_issue_write_same() works atm wrt to synchronous bio completions. However, most folks with a raw make_request or blk-mq backend driver that supports multiple GB/sec of zero bandwidth end up changing IBLOCK to support asynchronous REQ_WRITE_SAME completions anyways. I'd be happy to add support for that using __blkdev_issue_zeroout() once the basic conversion is in place. From ff74012eaff38f9fa0d74aca60507b9964f484ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Bellinger <redacted> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:21:47 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] target/iblock: Convert WRITE_SAME to blkdev_issue_zeroout Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <redacted> --- drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c index d316ed5..5bfde20 100644 --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static int iblock_configure_device(struct se_device *dev) struct block_device *bd = NULL; struct blk_integrity *bi; fmode_t mode; + unsigned int max_write_zeroes_sectors; int ret = -ENOMEM; if (!(ib_dev->ibd_flags & IBDF_HAS_UDEV_PATH)) {@@ -129,7 +130,11 @@ static int iblock_configure_device(struct se_device *dev) * Enable write same emulation for IBLOCK and use 0xFFFF as * the smaller WRITE_SAME(10) only has a two-byte block count. */ - dev->dev_attrib.max_write_same_len = 0xFFFF; + max_write_zeroes_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bd); + if (max_write_zeroes_sectors) + dev->dev_attrib.max_write_same_len = max_write_zeroes_sectors; + else + dev->dev_attrib.max_write_same_len = 0xFFFF; if (blk_queue_nonrot(q)) dev->dev_attrib.is_nonrot = 1;@@ -415,28 +420,31 @@ static void iblock_end_io_flush(struct bio *bio) } static sense_reason_t -iblock_execute_write_same_direct(struct block_device *bdev, struct se_cmd *cmd) +iblock_execute_zero_out(struct block_device *bdev, struct se_cmd *cmd) { struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev; struct scatterlist *sg = &cmd->t_data_sg[0]; - struct page *page = NULL; - int ret; + unsigned char *buf, zero = 0x00, *p = &zero; + int rc, ret; - if (sg->offset) { - page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL); - if (!page) - return TCM_OUT_OF_RESOURCES; - sg_copy_to_buffer(sg, cmd->t_data_nents, page_address(page), - dev->dev_attrib.block_size); - } + buf = kmap(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset; + if (!buf) + return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE; + /* + * Fall back to block_execute_write_same() slow-path if + * incoming WRITE_SAME payload does not contain zeros. + */ + rc = memcmp(buf, p, cmd->data_length); + kunmap(sg_page(sg)); + + if (rc) + return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE; - ret = blkdev_issue_write_same(bdev, + ret = blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, target_to_linux_sector(dev, cmd->t_task_lba), target_to_linux_sector(dev, sbc_get_write_same_sectors(cmd)), - GFP_KERNEL, page ? page : sg_page(sg)); - if (page) - __free_page(page); + GFP_KERNEL, false); if (ret) return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;@@ -472,8 +480,10 @@ static void iblock_end_io_flush(struct bio *bio) return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD; } - if (bdev_write_same(bdev)) - return iblock_execute_write_same_direct(bdev, cmd); + if (bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev)) { + if (!iblock_execute_zero_out(bdev, cmd)) + return 0; + } ibr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct iblock_req), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ibr)