Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 4 authors, 2017-11-14

Re: [PATCH 2/8] target: remove iblock WRITE_SAME passthrough support

From: Nicholas A. Bellinger <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-01 06:27:01
Also in: dm-devel, linux-scsi
Subsystem: scsi target subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: "Martin K. Petersen", Linus Torvalds

Hey HCH & Jens,

Is this already queued up for v4.13 to address the missing LBPRZ feature
bit..?

If not, I'll happy to take it via target-pending along with the
following to re-enable it via max_write_zeroes_sectors.
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
index d2f089c..e7caf78 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ bool target_configure_unmap_from_queue(struct se_dev_attrib *attrib,
        attrib->unmap_granularity = q->limits.discard_granularity / block_size;
        attrib->unmap_granularity_alignment = q->limits.discard_alignment /
                                                                block_size;
-       attrib->unmap_zeroes_data = 0;
+       attrib->unmap_zeroes_data = (q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors);
        return true;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(target_configure_unmap_from_queue);
Any objections..?

On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 22:30 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 18:08 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
Use the pscsi driver to support arbitrary command passthrough
instead.
The people who are actively using iblock_execute_write_same_direct() are
doing so in the context of ESX VAAI BlockZero, together with
EXTENDED_COPY and COMPARE_AND_WRITE primitives.  Just using PSCSI is not
an option for them.

In practice though I've not seen any users of IBLOCK WRITE_SAME for
anything other than VAAI BlockZero, so just using blkdev_issue_zeroout()
when available, and falling back to iblock_execute_write_same() if the
WRITE_SAME buffer contains anything other than zeros should be OK.

How about something like the following below..?

This would bring parity to how blkdev_issue_write_same() works atm wrt
to synchronous bio completions.  However, most folks with a raw
make_request or blk-mq backend driver that supports multiple GB/sec of
zero bandwidth end up changing IBLOCK to support asynchronous
REQ_WRITE_SAME completions anyways.

I'd be happy to add support for that using __blkdev_issue_zeroout() once
the basic conversion is in place.

From ff74012eaff38f9fa0d74aca60507b9964f484ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicholas Bellinger <redacted>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:21:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] target/iblock: Convert WRITE_SAME to blkdev_issue_zeroout

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <redacted>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
index d316ed5..5bfde20 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static int iblock_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
 	struct block_device *bd = NULL;
 	struct blk_integrity *bi;
 	fmode_t mode;
+	unsigned int max_write_zeroes_sectors;
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 
 	if (!(ib_dev->ibd_flags & IBDF_HAS_UDEV_PATH)) {
@@ -129,7 +130,11 @@ static int iblock_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
 	 * Enable write same emulation for IBLOCK and use 0xFFFF as
 	 * the smaller WRITE_SAME(10) only has a two-byte block count.
 	 */
-	dev->dev_attrib.max_write_same_len = 0xFFFF;
+	max_write_zeroes_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bd);
+	if (max_write_zeroes_sectors)
+		dev->dev_attrib.max_write_same_len = max_write_zeroes_sectors;
+	else
+		dev->dev_attrib.max_write_same_len = 0xFFFF;
 
 	if (blk_queue_nonrot(q))
 		dev->dev_attrib.is_nonrot = 1;
@@ -415,28 +420,31 @@ static void iblock_end_io_flush(struct bio *bio)
 }
 
 static sense_reason_t
-iblock_execute_write_same_direct(struct block_device *bdev, struct se_cmd *cmd)
+iblock_execute_zero_out(struct block_device *bdev, struct se_cmd *cmd)
 {
 	struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev;
 	struct scatterlist *sg = &cmd->t_data_sg[0];
-	struct page *page = NULL;
-	int ret;
+	unsigned char *buf, zero = 0x00, *p = &zero;
+	int rc, ret;
 
-	if (sg->offset) {
-		page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!page)
-			return TCM_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
-		sg_copy_to_buffer(sg, cmd->t_data_nents, page_address(page),
-				  dev->dev_attrib.block_size);
-	}
+	buf = kmap(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset;
+	if (!buf)
+		return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
+	/*
+	 * Fall back to block_execute_write_same() slow-path if
+	 * incoming WRITE_SAME payload does not contain zeros.
+	 */
+	rc = memcmp(buf, p, cmd->data_length);
+	kunmap(sg_page(sg));
+
+	if (rc)
+		return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
 
-	ret = blkdev_issue_write_same(bdev,
+	ret = blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev,
 				target_to_linux_sector(dev, cmd->t_task_lba),
 				target_to_linux_sector(dev,
 					sbc_get_write_same_sectors(cmd)),
-				GFP_KERNEL, page ? page : sg_page(sg));
-	if (page)
-		__free_page(page);
+				GFP_KERNEL, false);
 	if (ret)
 		return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
 
@@ -472,8 +480,10 @@ static void iblock_end_io_flush(struct bio *bio)
 		return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
 	}
 
-	if (bdev_write_same(bdev))
-		return iblock_execute_write_same_direct(bdev, cmd);
+	if (bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev)) {
+		if (!iblock_execute_zero_out(bdev, cmd))
+			return 0;
+	}
 
 	ibr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct iblock_req), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ibr)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help