On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:25:25PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:

Hello,

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 02:57:38PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:

quoted

Personally I don't care that much, but the risk of conflicts is much
higher on the block side, than on the kernfs side. So might be the
path of less resistance to pull it through the block tree. And I'd be
happy to do that, if the sign offs on the kernfs side are sufficient.

Block tree it is then.  Let's wait for Greg to respond.

block tree is fine with me, I'll go ack the kernfs patches now.

thanks,

greg k-h