Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2017-06-27

Re: [PATCH V2] lightnvm: if LUNs are already allocated fix return

From: Frans Klaver <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-27 11:27:48
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Rakesh Pandit [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:01:22PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Rakesh Pandit [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
While creating new device with NVM_DEV_CREATE if LUNs are already
allocated ioctl would return -ENOMEM which is wrong.  This patch
propagates -EBUSY from nvm_reserve_luns which is correct response.

Fixes: ade69e243 ("lightnvm: merge gennvm with core")
Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <redacted>
---

V2: return error code directly instead of using ret variable (Frans)

 drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
index b8f82f5..c5d71c6 100644
--- a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int nvm_create_tgt(struct nvm_dev *dev, struct nvm_ioctl_create *create)
        mutex_unlock(&dev->mlock);

        if (nvm_reserve_luns(dev, s->lun_begin, s->lun_end))
-               return -ENOMEM;
+               return -EBUSY;
Why aren't you propagating ret in this version?
Well nvm_reserve_luns either returns 0 or -EBUSY and it is unlikely
that return value would change and even if it does this can be
updated.
If you propagate the result of nvm_reserve_luns(), the casual reader
will immediately understand that any possible faulty result is
returned. returning -EBUSY here might suggest you're overriding
whatever this function returns.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help