Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 2 authors, 2017-06-20

Re: [PATCH 04/11] fs: add support for allowing applications to pass in write life time hints

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2017-06-19 16:02:12
Also in: linux-fsdevel

On 06/19/2017 08:56 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 06/19/2017 12:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 01:59:47PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted
Add four flags for the pwritev2(2) system call, allowing an application
to give the kernel a hint about what on-media life times can be
expected from a given write.

The intent is for these values to be relative to each other, no
absolute meaning should be attached to these flag names.

Set aside 3 bits in the iocb flags structure to carry this information
over from the pwritev2 RWF_WRITE_LIFE_* flags.
What is the strong use case for the per-I/O flags?  I'd much rather
stick to fcntl only for now if we can.
Fine, I guess I should just have dusted off the 2 year old patchset,
as that was _exactly_ what that did.
Actually, one good use case is O_DIRECT on a block device. Since I'm
not a huge fan of having per-call hints that is only useful for a
single case, how about we add the hints to the struct file as well?
For buffered IO, just grab it from the inode. If we have a file
available, then that overrides the per-inode setting.


-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help