Thread (55 messages) 55 messages, 6 authors, 2017-05-10

Re: [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG

From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Date: 2017-05-03 21:40:32

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:13:51AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Omar Sandoval [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:15:36PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted
When blk-mq I/O scheduler is used, we need two tags for
submitting one request. One is called scheduler tag for
allocating request and scheduling I/O, another one is called
driver tag, which is used for dispatching IO to hardware/driver.
This way introduces one extra per-queue allocation for both tags
and request pool, and may not be as efficient as case of none
scheduler.

Also currently we put a default per-hctx limit on schedulable
requests, and this limit may be a bottleneck for some devices,
especialy when these devices have a quite big tag space.

This patch introduces BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG so that we can
allow to use hardware/driver tags directly for IO scheduling if
devices's hardware tag space is big enough. Then we can avoid
the extra resource allocation and make IO submission more
efficient.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <redacted>
---
 block/blk-mq-sched.c   | 10 +++++++++-
 block/blk-mq.c         | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 include/linux/blk-mq.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
One more note on this: if we're using the hardware tags directly, then
we are no longer limited to q->nr_requests requests in-flight. Instead,
we're limited to the hw queue depth. We probably want to maintain the
original behavior,
That need further investigation, and generally scheduler should be happy with
more requests which can be scheduled.

We can make it as one follow-up.
If we say nr_requests is 256, then we should honor that. So either
update nr_requests to reflect the actual depth we're using or resize the
hardware tags.
quoted
so I think we need to resize the hw tags in blk_mq_init_sched() if we're using hardware tags.
That might not be good since hw tags are used by both scheduler and dispatching.
What do you mean? If we have BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG set, then they
are not used for dispatching, and of course we shouldn't resize the
hardware tags if we are using scheduler tags.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help