Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdio: Don't use abort-able claim host method from SDIO IRQ thread
From: Ulf Hansson <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-15 12:51:04
Also in:
linux-mmc
On 12 May 2017 at 09:42, Adrian Hunter [off-list ref] wrote:
On 11/05/17 15:39, Ulf Hansson wrote:quoted
In a step to simplify the use of the lock, mmc_claim|release_host(), let's change the SDIO IRQ thread to move away from using the abort-able claim host method. In the SDIO IRQ thread case, we can instead check the numbers of SDIO IRQs that are currently claimed via host->sdio_irqs, as this field is protected from updates unless the host is claimed. When host->sdio_irqs has become zero, it means the SDIO func driver(s) has released the SDIO IRQ, then we can bail out and stop running the SDIO IRQ thread.Does that work? It looks a like kthread_stop() will wait on the thread, which is waiting to claim the host, which is claimed by the caller of sdio_card_irq_put() which called kthread_stop() i.e. deadlock.
Adrian, you are right and thanks for your analyze! Maybe it's better that I first continue with my other series, converting the kthread to a work/work-queue. As that makes it easier to move away from using the abort-able claim host API. Kind regards Uffe
quoted
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <redacted> --- drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 10 ++++++---- include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c index 6d4b720..95f7a09 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c@@ -137,9 +137,13 @@ static int sdio_irq_thread(void *_host) * holding of the host lock does not cover too much work * that doesn't require that lock to be held. */ - ret = __mmc_claim_host(host, &host->sdio_irq_thread_abort); - if (ret) + mmc_claim_host(host); + if (!host->sdio_irqs) { + ret = 1; + mmc_release_host(host); break; + } + ret = process_sdio_pending_irqs(host); host->sdio_irq_pending = false; mmc_release_host(host);@@ -195,7 +199,6 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_get(struct mmc_card *card) if (!host->sdio_irqs++) { if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) { - atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 0); host->sdio_irq_thread = kthread_run(sdio_irq_thread, host, "ksdioirqd/%s", mmc_hostname(host));@@ -223,7 +226,6 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card) if (!--host->sdio_irqs) { if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD)) { - atomic_set(&host->sdio_irq_thread_abort, 1); kthread_stop(host->sdio_irq_thread); } else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) { host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h index 21385ac..8a4131f 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h@@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ struct mmc_host { unsigned int sdio_irqs; struct task_struct *sdio_irq_thread; bool sdio_irq_pending; - atomic_t sdio_irq_thread_abort; mmc_pm_flag_t pm_flags; /* requested pm features */