On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:01:28PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:26:51AM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:59:41PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
@@ -1789,7 +1789,8 @@ static void nvme_reset_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (result)
goto out;
- if ((dev->ctrl.oacs & NVME_CTRL_OACS_SEC_SUPP) && !dev->ctrl.opal_dev) {
+ kfree(dev->ctrl.opal_dev);
+ if (dev->ctrl.oacs & NVME_CTRL_OACS_SEC_SUPP) {
dev->ctrl.opal_dev =
init_opal_dev(&dev->ctrl, &nvme_sec_submit);
}
A couple things.
This has a use-after-free in opal_unlock_from_suspend if the nvme
device had an opal_dev before, but no longer support the capability
after resume. So you'd want to set ctrl.opal_dev to NULL after the free.
But we don't want to unconditionally free it anyway during resume
since opal_unlock_from_suspend requires the exisiting opal_dev state
information saved in the 'unlk_list'.
Something like this instead:
Yes, that looks fine to me. We'll probably also need the additional
fixup Scott pointed out.
I'm working on it now. Do you want a diff like Keith did or a separate patch?