Re: Doubt related to immutable biovecs
From: Suraj Choudhari <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-02 09:35:32
Thanks very much Ming and all !
I referred to multipage bvec patches link and it was indeed good & insightful.
I have few more query related to immutable bvecs & multipage bvecs, in
particular related to 4.4 kernel --
1) My understanding is bi_vcnt can't be used for a cloned BIO because
'bio_clone_fast' does NOT update the bi_vcnt field in the cloned BIO.
Is my understanding correct ?
2) For a block device driver, is it be safe to use the 'bi_vcnt' of a
BIO that's received from the upper layers, in order to access the
bvecs array, particularly in the '4.4' kernel ?
- I am thinking it may be safe to access bi_vcnt as long as the
block driver has NOT received a CLONE bio from upper layer. The
reason I think can be bvecs are not multipage in 4.4. Is my
understanding right ?
Thanks & Regards,
Suraj
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Ming Lei [off-list ref] wrote:Hi, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Suraj Choudhari [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hello, I've some queries related to accessing the 'bio_vec' and 'bi_vcnt' members in the BIO structure after the kernel changes implemented for the 'immutable biovecs' - Background - - From the changes done for the immutable biovecs, I understand that the driver code now no longer needs to reference the 'bi_vcnt' and 'bi_io_vec' fields directly. Instead we can use the 'bvec_iter' iterator in order to to access the bio_vec. - We've iterator functions bio_iter_iovec() and bio_advance_iter() as well, which return us literal 'struct biovecs' taking into account the bi_bvec_done and bi_size values. Doubts - 1) Few functions in the block layer and some drivers still directly refer to the 'bi_vcnt' and 'bio_vec' members of the BIO structure [instead of accessing bio_vecs using the bvec_iter iterator]. Would there be some changes in the functions to compulsorily use the 'bvec_iter' in order to access bio_vecs? If yes, are such changesGenerally speaking, yes, it is always better to use iterator helpers.quoted
related to the 'multipage biovec' feature ?Yes, it is a must for supporting multipage bvec.quoted
2) Can there be some problem if a driver directly accesses the bi_io_vec [bio_vec] in the bio structure based on the values of bi_idx and bi_vcnt ? [instead of using the bvec_iter iterator].The direct access can't work any more once switching to multipage bvec, and you can find some hint in the following link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/15/266 Also .bi_vcnt can't be used for BIO_CLONED bio, and it is very easy to make mistakes to access the table directly if someone don't understand the iterator details enough. Thanks, Ming Lei