Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq-sched: Allocate sched reserved tags as specified in the original queue tagset
flat view
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2017-02-27 16:17:33
Also in:
linux-nvme
On 02/27/2017 09:14 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:10:01PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
Hm, this may fix the crash, but I'm not sure it'll work as intended. When we allocate the request, we'll get a reserved scheduler tag, but then when we go to dispatch the request and call blk_mq_get_driver_tag(), we'll be competing with all of the normal requests for a regular driver tag. So maybe on top of this we should add the BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED flag to the allocation attempt in blk_mq_get_driver_tag() if the scheduler tag is reserved? I'm hazy on what we expect from reserved tags, so feel free to call me crazy.Yeah good point, we need to carry it through. Reserved tags exist because drivers often need a request/tag for error handling. If all tags currently are used up for regular IO that is stuck, you need a reserved tag for error handling to guarantee progress. So Sagi's patch does take it half the way there, but get_driver_tag really needs to know about this as well, or we will just get stuck there as well. Two solutions, I can think of: 1) Check the tag value in get_driver_tag, add BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED when allocating a driver tag if above X. 2) Add an RQF_SOMETHING_RESERVED. Add BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED in get_driver_tag if that is set. Comments?Option 1 looks simple enough that I don't think it warrants a new request flag (compile tested only):diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 9e6b064e5339..87590f7d4f80 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c@@ -852,6 +852,9 @@ bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **hctx, return true; } + if (rq->internal_tag < data.hctx->sched_tags->nr_reserved_tags) + data.flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED; + rq->tag = blk_mq_get_tag(&data); if (rq->tag >= 0) { if (blk_mq_tag_busy(data.hctx)) {
Agree, that's identical to what I just sent out as well, functionally.
quoted
Can't we just not go through the scheduler for reserved tags? Obviously there is no point in scheduling them...That sounds nice, since I'd be worried about the scheduler also needing to be aware of the reserved status lest it also get the reserved request stuck behind some normal requests. But, we special case flush in this way, and it has been a huge pain.
The caller better be using head insertion for this, in case we already have requests in the queue. But that's no different than the current logic. So I think it should work fine. -- Jens Axboe