Thread (23 messages) flat view 23 messages, 6 authors, 2017-02-15

Re: Boot regression (was "Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock when scheduling workqueue elements")

From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2017-02-14 14:51:10
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:46:41PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
quoted
From: hch@lst.de [mailto:hch@lst.de]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 22:29
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Boot regression (was "Re: [PATCH] genhd: Do not hold event lock
when scheduling workqueue elements")

Ok, thanks for testing.  Can you try the patch below?  It fixes a
clear problem which was partially papered over before the commit
you bisected to, although it can't explain why blk-mq still works.
Still bad luck. :-(

BTW, I'm using the first "bad" commit (scsi: allocate scsi_cmnd structures as
part of struct request) + the 2 patches you provided today.

I suppose I don't need to test the 2 patches on the latest linux-next repo.
I'd love a test on that repo actually.  We had a few other for sense
handling since then I think.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help