On Fri, Jan 27 2017 at 11:36am -0500,
Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:34:34AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
quoted
Noticed after further review that it seems a bit weird to have the non
blk-mq support in drivers calling blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(). But I'm not sure
a blk_rq_to_pdu() macro to blk_mq_rq_to_pdu() is the right thing. What
do you guys think?
My first version had an additional name for it, but it caused more
confusion than help.
And renaming blk_mq_rq_to_pdu() to blk_rq_to_pdu() tree-wide would be
too much churn?
I can live with blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(); just figured I'd ask.