Re: [RFC PATCH] pci: add pci_irq_get_affinity_vector()
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date: 2016-11-08 15:09:01
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml
On 11/08/2016 03:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:47:21AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:quoted
Add a reverse-mapping function to return the interrupt vector for any CPU if interrupt affinity is enabled.What's the use case of it? Also as-is this won't work due to the non-affinity vectors that have the affinity set to all cpus. It will get even worse if we have to support things like virtio_net that have multiple interrupts per CPU due to the send and receive virtqueues.
The use-case here is that one needs to feed the MSI-X index into the driver command structure. While we can extract that number trivially with scsi-mq, but for scsi-sq we don't have such means. So if we start assigning interrupt affinity per default we need to figure out the msi-x index from a given SCSI command. Currently most of these drivers keep an internal CPU map which I'd love to get rid of. Hence this patch. And before you complain: Yes, this patch is wrong; it returns the vector and not the index (which is what I'm after). I found that on my test machine :-( The main impetus of this RFC is to figure out if such a function would have a chance of getting upstream, or if I have to continue use cpumaps in the drivers. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N�rnberg GF: F. Imend�rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG N�rnberg)