Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 2 authors, 2016-10-28

Re: [PATCH 1/8] block: add WRITE_BG

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Date: 2016-10-28 14:57:07
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On 10/27/2016 12:37 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
  *			non-volatile media on completion.
+ * WRITE_BG		Background write. This is for background activity like
+ *			the periodic flush and background threshold writeback
  *
  */
 #define RW_MASK			REQ_OP_WRITE
@@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ typedef int (dio_iodone_t)(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
 #define WRITE_FLUSH		(REQ_SYNC | REQ_NOIDLE | REQ_PREFLUSH)
 #define WRITE_FUA		(REQ_SYNC | REQ_NOIDLE | REQ_FUA)
 #define WRITE_FLUSH_FUA		(REQ_SYNC | REQ_NOIDLE | REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA)
+#define WRITE_BG		(REQ_NOIDLE | REQ_BG)
I've been trying to kill off these WRITE_ flags as they aren't exactly
helpful, see my branch here that I'm waiting for the previous serious to
go in:

   http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/shortlog/refs/heads/block-flags
I'll just adapt to whatever goes in first, not really a concern for me.
Which also begs the question why you add the REQ_NOIDLE flag above, as
it's only applied to synchronous queues in cfq as far as I can tell.
Right, it's a CFQ hint. We only want to potentially idle for direct/sync 
writes, not buffer async writeback.
And while I'm at nitpicking about the most trivial patch of the
series anyway:  any good reason to not just spell out the "BACKGROUND" ?
Sure, I can make that change.

-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help