On Sat, Jul 16 2016 at  2:14pm -0400,
James Bottomley [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sat, 2016-07-16 at 14:10 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jul 15 2016 at  9:08pm -0400,
Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:03:54PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

"Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] writes:

Christoph> I was a bit overeager to thing ALL_TG_PT would solve
all our
Christoph> multipathing woes in respect to persistent
reservation.
Christoph> Turns out that there are lots of possible setups where
it
Christoph> doesn't work, and we'll have to ask device mapper to
register
Christoph> all underlying devices instead.

Should I queue the sd patch or let Mike take both through the DM
tree?

I think having both in the same tree would be very useful.  I don't 
care which one that is.

I've picked both of them up.  Staged for 4.8 merge and in linux-next 
via linux-dm.git's 'for-next'.

(I added Martin's Acked-by to the sd patch header, Martin: if not OK, 
or if you'd prefer Reviewed-by just let me know)

You are actually missing the reviewed by tags from Mike Christie on
this, which should be added.

Added, thanks!