X Xifengfei #
Message details and related content
Thanks a lot. I understand the purpose. So is the original judgment process too complicated? Can we judge bi_size directly? This will be more concise
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static bool check_should_bypass(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio) add_sequential(task); i->sequential = 0; found: - if (i->sequential + bio->bi_iter.bi_size > i->sequential) + if (!bio->bi_iter.bi_size) i->sequential += bio->bi_iter.bi_size; i->last = bio_end_sector(bio);
Thanks Fengfei -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Coly Li [mailto:colyli@suse.de] 发送时间: 2021年8月29日 15:50 收件人: xifengfei (RD) [off-list ref] 抄送: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kent.overstreet@gmail.com 主题: Re: [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi_size On 8/29/21 12:49 PM, Fengfei Xi wrote:
The bi_size is unsigned int type data not less than 0, so we can directly add bi_size without extra judgment Signed-off-by: Fengfei Xi <redacted>
NACK. The check is necessary to avoid redundant and unnecessary memory write. Coly Li
quoted hunk
--- drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c index 6d1de889b..2788eec3a 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c@@ -423,9 +423,7 @@ static bool check_should_bypass(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio) add_sequential(task); i->sequential = 0; found: - if (i->sequential + bio->bi_iter.bi_size > i->sequential) - i->sequential += bio->bi_iter.bi_size; - + i->sequential += bio->bi_iter.bi_size; i->last = bio_end_sector(bio); i->jiffies = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(5000); task->sequential_io = i->sequential;