Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2017-11-24

Re: [PATCH v2] bcache: check return value of register_shrinker

From: Michael Lyle <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-24 22:24:44

Just a note to everyone-- a quick Reviewed-by: would be appreciated from
someone here on the bcache list because I'm hoping to get this sent off
with a couple other things to Jens soon.  -mpl

On 11/24/2017 02:02 PM, Michael Lyle wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
register_shrinker is now __must_check, so check it to kill a warning.
Caller of bch_btree_cache_alloc in super.c appropriately checks return
value so this is fully plumbed through.

This V2 fixes checkpatch warnings and improves the commit description,
as I was too hasty getting the previous version out.

Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle <redacted>
---
 drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index 11c5503d31dc..81e8dc3dbe5e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -807,7 +807,10 @@ int bch_btree_cache_alloc(struct cache_set *c)
 	c->shrink.scan_objects = bch_mca_scan;
 	c->shrink.seeks = 4;
 	c->shrink.batch = c->btree_pages * 2;
-	register_shrinker(&c->shrink);
+
+	if (register_shrinker(&c->shrink))
+		pr_warn("bcache: %s: could not register shrinker",
+				__func__);
 
 	return 0;
 }
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help