Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2017-03-01

Re: Drop in Iops with fsync when using NVMe as cache

From: shiva rkreddy <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-01 03:07:51

The backing device is a 7.2K SAS disk, in RAID0 (Megaraid sas controller)..

Thanks for comment on data-offset. Will give that a try..

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Eric Wheeler [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, shiva rkreddy wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
fio command without fsync:

# fio -filename=/dev/bcache0 -direct=1 -ioengine=libaio -rw=randwrite
-bs=4k -name=mytest -iodepth=1 -runtime=30 -time_based

iops : 35k

fio command with fsync:

fio -filename=/dev/bcache0 -direct=1 -ioengine=libaio -rw=randwrite
-bs=4k -name=mytest -iodepth=1 -runtime=30 -time_based -fsync=1
Try -runtime=25 since 30s is the default writeback delay.  More below.
quoted
quoted
quoted
iops: 8.1k
quoted
I'm quite surprised by the drop in iops with fsync turned on. Is this
expected or am I missing some basic setting?
It's not uncommon that fsync would have a huge performance impact.
Without fsync, most of the data never hits the storage and is only
staying in the system memory.

May I suggest that you try to measure the performance of the same tests
when the filesystem is created on the NVMe device directly, without
using bcache? You're likely to observe a similar pattern.
I've tried fio directly on nvme device and without filesystem. The
drop with fsync is not that significant; 44313 vs 42713 on a 30s
randwrite run with iodepth=1
Try using `make-bcache --data-offset X ...` to align your backing device.
It defaults to an 8k offset which may not be optimal. By the way, what is
your backing device /dev/sdb?

Try these, too:

echo 0 > /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/sequential_cutoff
echo 10000000 > /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/cache/congested_read_threshold_us
echo 10000000 > /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/cache/congested_write_threshold_us





--
Eric Wheeler

quoted

# fio -filename=/dev/nvme0n1 -direct=1 -ioengine=libaio -rw=randwrite
-bs=4k -name=mytest -iodepth=1 -runtime=30 -time_based
mytest: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1
fio-2.1.3
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w] [100.0% done] [0KB/177.6MB/0KB /s] [0/45.5K/0 iops]
[eta 00m:00s]
mytest: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=2131: Thu Feb  9 18:56:01 2017
  write: io=5193.2MB, bw=177253KB/s, iops=44313, runt= 30001msec

# fio -filename=/dev/nvme0n1 -direct=1 -ioengine=libaio -rw=randwrite
-bs=4k -name=mytest -iodepth=1 -runtime=30 -time_based -fsync=1
mytest: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1
fio-2.1.3
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w] [100.0% done] [0KB/167.4MB/0KB /s] [0/42.9K/0 iops]
[eta 00m:00s]
mytest: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=2136: Thu Feb  9 19:04:54 2017
  write: io=5005.5MB, bw=170853KB/s, iops=42713, runt= 30000msec


On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Vojtech Pavlik [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:48:06AM -0600, shiva rkreddy wrote:


--
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help