Re: [PULL] bcache: based on for-4.10/block, multiple updates
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2017-01-31 19:28:11
Also in:
lkml
On 01/31/2017 11:14 AM, Eric Wheeler wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Jens Axboe wrote:quoted
On 12/14/2016 06:50 PM, Eric Wheeler wrote:quoted
Hi Jens, I know you're busy, so when you get a moment: I've not yet seen your ack/nack on this yet and I want to make sure it gets in before the merge window closes for v4.10. I rebased it on for-4.10/block as you asked so its tested and ready to go as of 12/6 unless you see something that I've missed.Pulled for 4.10, sorry about the delay.Hi Jens, Looking at 4.10-rc6, I see these two commits were merged:quoted
bcache: partition support: add 16 minors per bcacheN device bcache: Make gc wakeup sane, remove set_task_state()but these were in the same 'for-4.10-block-bcache-updates' and don't appear to have been applied:quoted
bcache: introduce per-process ioprio-based bypass/writeback hints bcache: documentation for ioprio cache hinting bcache: update bio->bi_opf bypass/writeback REQ_ flag hintsDid I miss an email that caused their exclusion? Did these get bumped to 4.11 for some reason?
I thought I sent out that reply, maybe I didn't. I dropped the last three for two reasons: 1) They happened after the merge window, and it's really a feature addon that should have gone in earlier 2) There seemed to be confusion and discussion around the interface that needed to be resolved first. Hope that explains it. -- Jens Axboe