Re: bcache-tools: minor change for bcache-register
From: Kent Overstreet <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-26 21:48:48
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2013-08-27 · Re: bcache-tools: minor change for bcache-register · Gabriel de Perthuis <hidden>
- 2013-08-27 · Re: bcache-tools: minor change for bcache-register · Rolf Fokkens <hidden>
- 2013-08-27 · Re: bcache-tools: minor change for bcache-register · Gabriel de Perthuis <hidden>
- 2013-08-27 · Re: bcache-tools: minor change for bcache-register · Alex Pyrgiotis <hidden>
- 2013-08-27 · Re: bcache-tools: minor change for bcache-register · Rolf Fokkens <hidden>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:31:25PM +0000, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:17:58 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:quoted
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:14:06AM +0200, Rolf Fokkens wrote:quoted
/sys/fs/bcache/register 2>/dev/null I can imagine there's a more elegant solution, suggestions are welcome./sys/fs/bcache/register_quietGood point: the messages come from the kernel. register_quiet would make legitimate errors harder to debug however. I'll just send a patch to change "device already registered" to a low-priority pr_debug message rather than something that looks like an error.
register_quiet isn't supposed to suppress legit errors - if it does that's a bug