Re: Expected Behavior
From: Jonathan Tripathy <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-01 12:47:52
On 31/08/2012 13:41, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
On 31.08.2012 13:36, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:quoted
On 31.08.2012 04:47, James Harper wrote:quoted
quoted
Hi Kent, I'm going to try and reproduce it myself as well. I just used IOMeter in a Windows DomU with 30 workers, each having an io depth of 256. A *very* heavy workload indeed, but my point was to see if I could break something. Unless the issue is specific to windows causing problems (NTFS or whatever), I'm guessing running fio with 30 jobs and an iodepth of 256 would probably produce a similar load. BTW, do you have access to a Xen node for testing?Does the problem resolve itself after you shut down the windows DomU? Or only when you reboot the whole Dom0?Hi There, I managed to reproduce this again. I have to reboot the entire Dom0 (the physical server) for it to work properly again. James, are you able to reproduce this? Kent, are there any other tests/debug output you need from me?BTW, I was using IOMeter's 'default' Access Specification with the following modifications: 100% random, 66% read, 33% write, and a 2kB size. My bcache is formatted for 512bytes. --
Kent, is there any debug output of some sort I could switch on and help you figure out what's going on? If needs be, I can give you access to my setup here where you can run these tests yourself, if you're not keen installing Xen on your end :) Thanks