On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:22:24 -0700 Kent Overstreet [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Had to shuffle the code around a bit (where bi_rw and bi_end_io were
set), but shouldn't really be anything tricky here
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <redacted>
CC: Jens Axboe <redacted>
CC: NeilBrown <redacted>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 7c19dbe..ebe43f7 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -561,14 +561,6 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
bi = &sh->dev[i].req;
rbi = &sh->dev[i].rreq; /* For writing to replacement */
- bi->bi_rw = rw;
- rbi->bi_rw = rw;
- if (rw & WRITE) {
- bi->bi_end_io = raid5_end_write_request;
- rbi->bi_end_io = raid5_end_write_request;
- } else
- bi->bi_end_io = raid5_end_read_request;
-
rcu_read_lock();
rrdev = rcu_dereference(conf->disks[i].replacement);
smp_mb(); /* Ensure that if rrdev is NULL, rdev won't be */@@ -643,7 +635,14 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
set_bit(STRIPE_IO_STARTED, &sh->state);
+ bio_reset(bi);
bi->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
+ bi->bi_rw = rw;
+ bi->bi_end_io = (rw & WRITE)
+ ? raid5_end_write_request
+ : raid5_end_read_request;
+ bi->bi_private = sh;
+
pr_debug("%s: for %llu schedule op %ld on disc %d\n",
__func__, (unsigned long long)sh->sector,
bi->bi_rw, i);@@ -657,12 +656,9 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags))
bi->bi_rw |= REQ_FLUSH;
- bi->bi_flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
- bi->bi_idx = 0;
bi->bi_io_vec[0].bv_len = STRIPE_SIZE;
bi->bi_io_vec[0].bv_offset = 0;
bi->bi_size = STRIPE_SIZE;
- bi->bi_next = NULL;
if (rrdev)
set_bit(R5_DOUBLE_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
generic_make_request(bi);
@@ -674,7 +670,14 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
set_bit(STRIPE_IO_STARTED, &sh->state);
+ bio_reset(rbi);
rbi->bi_bdev = rrdev->bdev;
+ rbi->bi_rw = rw;
+ rbi->bi_end_io = (rw & WRITE)
+ ? raid5_end_write_request
+ : raid5_end_read_request;
'rbi->bi_end_io' can only ever be raid5_end_write_request. We only get here
on a write.
I'd be OK with
BUG_ON(!(rw & WRITE));
but I don't want the condition in the assignment.
The rest looks quite sane.
Thanks
NeilBrown