Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-08-28

RE: Block Size for Windows

From: James Harper <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-28 00:59:11

On 27/08/2012 21:18, Joseph Glanville wrote:
quoted
On 28 August 2012 06:15, Jonathan Tripathy [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 27/08/2012 21:07, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
quoted
On 27/08/2012 21:00, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
quoted
quoted
2) The windows setup didn't complain that it couldn't install on
the LV, but once I clicked 'next', the Dom0 crashed and the server
rebooted. A lot of output was displayed on screen but quickly
vanished as the system rebooted. I'm trying to see if the output
was saved anywhere. Any ideas why this could of happened and/or
where the output might be saved?
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
I'd also like to add that after the server came back up, the md
raid array started rebuilding. I wondering if that's just a
coincidence (due to the forced reboot), or a sign of something
wrong with the md integration with bcache?

I'm going to see if Windows installs natively on the md array (it's
RAID
10 btw) and post back here.
Ok, so trying to install Windows directly onto the spindles causes
the same thing to happen. I'm going to try and boot up into the
non-bcache kernel (The default ubuntu one) and see if it works
there. If it fails there, then this is clearly a xen and/or mdraid issue...

Thanks
Ok, so booting into the default Ubuntu kernel, the windows
installation seems to progress just fine.

Does this mean there is something wrong with the mdraid code in the
bcache kernel?

Actually, I'm not telling the whole story. The kernel I'm using is
the
bcache-3.2 tree (from evilpriate.org) with changes merged in from
kernel.org's 3.2.27 tree. There were no merge conflicts when I did
the git merge.

What do you think I should do?


Thanks

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I would recommend booting with the raw bcache-3.2 branch before
applying the stable patches (even though they should be fine) and
trying to catch the panic.
This is easiest done with a serial port and setting it to the kernel
console on the kernel command line in grub.

Joseph.
Hi There,

I can confirm that the problem occurs even when using the raw bcache-3.2
branch from evilpirate.org. Just to clarify, I am trying to install Windows
Server 2008 in a Xen HVM DomU, onto an LV which is on top of a MDRAID 10
array. Using the bcache-3.2 kernel, the system reboots (after
panicing) as soon as I click 'next' after selecting the drive to install windows
onto. Using the standard Ubuntu kernel everything works as normal. This
leads me to believe that there is an issue with the mdraid code inside the
bcache-3.2 tree. I'd like to stress that I wasn't doing any bcaching during this
test.
FWIW, i'm using the 3.2 patches applied to a Debian kernel with lvm on raid1 (not raid10) on bcache and it's all working fine since I changed to a 512 byte block size. I haven't done an install of 2008, just 2003, but there doesn't seem to be any problems.
What should my next step be? Try and find a serial cable to capture the
debug output?
Before tinkering with a serial cable, see if the system is alive enough to use netconsole - it can be a bit of a timesaver.

James
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help