[PATCH v1 02/10] dt-binding: clk: ast2700: Add binding for Aspeed AST27xx Clock
From: Kevin Chen <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-16 04:06:58
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Krzk, I will separate clock part in the v3 patch into Ryan's clock series.
Missing commit msg. A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings. See also: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bin dings/submitting-patches.rst#L18 Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are explained here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patch es.html#i-for-patch-submitters
Agree, already fixed in another commit in Ryan's series. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/patch/20240808075937.2756733-4-ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com/
quoted
--- .../dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h | 180 ++++++++++++++++++This is supposed to be part of bindings adding the clock controller.quoted
1 file changed, 180 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.hdiff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.hb/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5ca85503736d--- /dev/null +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) */ +/* + * Device Tree binding constants for AST2700 clock controller. + * + * Copyright (c) 2023 Aspeed Technology Inc. + */ + +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H #define +__DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_AST2700_H + +/* SOC0 clk-gate */ +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_MCLK (0) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECLK (1)Drop all (). Not needed, not useful.quoted
+#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_GCLK (2) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VCLK (3) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_BCLK (4) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_D1CLK (5) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_REFCLK (6) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_USB0CLK (7) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSV8 (8) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_USB1CLK (9) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_D2CLK (10) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSV11 (11) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSV12 (12) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_YCLK (13) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_USB2CLK (14) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UART4CLK (15) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_SLICLK (16) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DACCLK (17) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_DP (18) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSV19 (19) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT1CLK (20) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_CRT2CLK (21) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_VLCLK (22) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_ECCCLK (23) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RSACLK (24) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS0CLK (25) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_UFSCLK (26) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_EMMCCLK (27) +#define SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK (28) +/* reserved 29 ~ 31*/IDs cannot be reserved. It is a binding, not a hardware number.
Agree, already fixed in another commit in Ryan's series. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/patch/20240808075937.2756733-4-ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com/
quoted
+#define SOC0_CLK_GATE_NUM (SCU0_CLK_GATE_RVAS1CLK + 1)No drop. Others as well.
Agree, already fixed in another commit in Ryan's series. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/patch/20240808075937.2756733-4-ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com/
Best regards, Krzysztof
-- Best Regards, Kevin.Chen ************* Email Confidentiality Notice ******************** ????: ???(????)????????????????? ???????????????????????????, ??????????????????????????????! DISCLAIMER: This message (and any attachments) may contain legally privileged and/or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete the e-mail and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.