Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: ipq6018: enable USB2 support
From: Kathiravan T <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-08 05:45:21
On 2021-02-07 14:38, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Kathiravan T, Thanks for your review. On Fri, Feb 05 2021, Kathiravan T wrote:quoted
On 2021-01-27 19:50, Baruch Siach wrote:quoted
From: Kathiravan T <redacted> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <redacted> [baruch: adjust regs address/size; drop binding updates; drop unsupported quirk properties] Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts | 8 ++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dtsb/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts index 99cefe88f6f2..5aec18308712 100644--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts@@ -78,3 +78,11 @@ nand@0 { nand-bus-width = <8>; }; }; + +&qusb_phy_1 { + status = "ok"; +}; + +&usb2 { + status = "ok"; +};diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsib/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi index 9fa5b028e4f3..d4a3d4e4a7e9 100644--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi@@ -524,6 +524,54 @@ qrtr_requests { }; }; + qusb_phy_1: qusb@59000 { + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-qusb2-phy"; + reg = <0x0 0x059000 0x0 0x180>; + #phy-cells = <0>; + + clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB1_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>, + <&xo>; + clock-names = "cfg_ahb", "ref";As per the bindings, ref clock should be 19.2MHz where the XO in IPQ60xx is 24MHz. Did the USB enumerated successfully and able to perform read / write operations?I managed to enumerate an Ethernet USB dongle with only this series applied. But then I tested again with USB storage device. That only worked with downstream clock adjust/period patch: https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/qsdk/oss/kernel/linux-ipq-5.4/commit/?h=fig&id=707d8fa2b481888f4792edc6561e81999301cbcf That patch applies cleanly on top of v5.11-rc4. Is anyone at Codeaurora pushing the dwc3 clock patch upstream? Should I do that?
Sure, please go ahead.
Thanks, baruch
-- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation