Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2021-02-26

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the adreno smmu specific impl earlier

From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-26 08:07:27
Also in: linux-iommu, lkml

On 2021-02-25 23:36, Jordan Crouse wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 03:54:10PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
quoted
Adreno(GPU) SMMU and APSS(Application Processor SubSystem) SMMU
both implement "arm,mmu-500" in some QTI SoCs and to run through
adreno smmu specific implementation such as enabling split pagetables
support, we need to match the "qcom,adreno-smmu" compatible first
before apss smmu or else we will be running apps smmu implementation
for adreno smmu and the additional features for adreno smmu is never
set. For ex: we have "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500" compatible for both apps
and adreno smmu implementing "arm,mmu-500", so the adreno smmu
implementation is never reached because the current sequence checks
for apps smmu compatible(qcom,sc7280-smmu-500) first and runs that
specific impl and we never reach adreno smmu specific implementation.

Suggested-by: Akhil P Oommen <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <redacted>
---

Its either this or we add a new compatible for adreno smmu 
implementing
arm,mmu-500 like "qcom,sc7280-adreno-smmu-500".

---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c 
b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index bea3ee0dabc2..7d0fc2c8e72f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -345,11 +345,11 @@ struct arm_smmu_device 
*qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
 	const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;

-	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
-		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
-
 	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
 		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl);

+	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
+		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
+
It would be good to add a comment here explaining the order here so we
don't accidentally reorganize ourselves back into a problem later.
Sure its better, will add it.

Thanks,
Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help