Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the adreno smmu specific impl earlier
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-26 08:07:27
Also in:
linux-iommu, lkml
On 2021-02-25 23:36, Jordan Crouse wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 03:54:10PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:quoted
Adreno(GPU) SMMU and APSS(Application Processor SubSystem) SMMU both implement "arm,mmu-500" in some QTI SoCs and to run through adreno smmu specific implementation such as enabling split pagetables support, we need to match the "qcom,adreno-smmu" compatible first before apss smmu or else we will be running apps smmu implementation for adreno smmu and the additional features for adreno smmu is never set. For ex: we have "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500" compatible for both apps and adreno smmu implementing "arm,mmu-500", so the adreno smmu implementation is never reached because the current sequence checks for apps smmu compatible(qcom,sc7280-smmu-500) first and runs that specific impl and we never reach adreno smmu specific implementation. Suggested-by: Akhil P Oommen <redacted> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <redacted> --- Its either this or we add a new compatible for adreno smmu implementing arm,mmu-500 like "qcom,sc7280-adreno-smmu-500". --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.cb/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c index bea3ee0dabc2..7d0fc2c8e72f 100644--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c@@ -345,11 +345,11 @@ struct arm_smmu_device*qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) { const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node; - if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np)) - return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl); - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu")) return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl); + if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np)) + return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl); +It would be good to add a comment here explaining the order here so we don't accidentally reorganize ourselves back into a problem later.
Sure its better, will add it. Thanks, Sai -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation