Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] dt-bindings: Orientation defines

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 12:47:23PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:

Quoting Thierry Reding (2026-09-21 12:33:54)

quoted

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 10:35:38AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 09:07:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 21 Sept 2026 at 09:05, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 18 Sept 2026 at 12:55, Kieran Bingham wrote:

quoted

Add a new dt-bindings/media/video-interface-devices.h header that
initially supports the Orientation types and convert existing users
throughout the code base.

Just noticed these are already in since commit 6ab5acfb8dd38729
("dt-bindings: media: Add macros for video interface devices") in
media/master (next-20260903 and later)?

quoted

v3 collects tags, and fixes the typo, but drops all hunks that do not

[...]

quoted

v2:

Interesting changelog order ;-)

[...]

quoted

v3:

[...]

quoted

-v4:

[...]

quoted

-v5:
 - Definitions now accepted in linux-media, rebased to get conversions in.

Oh, you say so here ;-)

quoted

      arm64: dts: renesas: Convert to new media orientation definitions

So it's been safe for me to pick this up since v5?

No it's not, there is a hard dependency.

The whole series needs to be postponed by one kernel cycle :-/ It's not
urgent so it's not a big deal. Kieran will have the priviledge of
rebasing and sending a v7 :-)

If all platform maintainers Ack this series, they could go through the
media tree where the shared include was already merged. Alternatively
the media maintainers could provide a shared branch for everyone to pull
into their platform trees.

But given that this is simply replacing a literal with a preprocessor
macro, maybe not worth the extra hassle.

Indeed, I'm not personally worried here. I thought that because Sakari
had accepted the main patches these could go in now, so I refreshed the
series.

I don't really care which route they go, or when. I'd rather not have to
re-re-rebase again in two months ... but I can cope whatever :D There's
certainly no urgency here.

You already have my Acked-by and I'm fine with anyone picking up the
Tegra DT changes. I don't think there's going to be any conflict with
any other work in the Tegra tree. If they don't get applied, I'll pick
it up for the next release.

Thierry