Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 3 authors, 20d ago

Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] KVM: arm64: Donate MMIO to the hypervisor

From: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Date: 2026-09-09 15:39:47
Also in: kvmarm, lkml

Hi Mostaf, Seb,

On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 at 17:43, Sebastian Ene [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
...
+int __pkvm_host_donate_hyp_mmio(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size)
+{
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+       /*
+        * We set HYP as the owner of the MMIO pages in the host stage-2, for:
+        * - host aborts: host_stage2_adjust_range() would fail for invalid non zero PTEs.
+        * - recycle under memory pressure: host_stage2_unmap_dev_all() would call
+        *   kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap() which will not clear non zero invalid ptes (counted).
+        * - other MMIO donation: Would fail as we check that the PTE is valid or empty.
+        */
+       ret = host_stage2_try(kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate, &host_mmu.pgt,
+                             addr, size, &host_s2_pool,
+                             KVM_HOST_INVALID_PTE_TYPE_DONATION,
+                             FIELD_PREP(KVM_HOST_DONATION_PTE_OWNER_MASK, PKVM_ID_HYP));
Before this patch the hyp linear map held nothing but memory, and this
adds the first device mapping to it. That places it outside
`fix_host_ownership()`, whose scope is the memblock list, so nothing
at init verifies the ownership. It's correct as written: the donation
writes the host stage-2 annotation itself.

This has already gone wrong once with the hyp stacks. The fix [1] adds
`pkvm_check_host_ownership()` over the private range, which fails init
on a leaf that isn't hyp-owned. I'd move this mapping there rather
than leave it outside any ownership walk.

...
+int __pkvm_hyp_donate_host_mmio(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size)
+{
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+               virt = __hyp_va(addr + offset);
+               if (kvm_pgtable_hyp_unmap(&pkvm_pgtable, (u64)virt, PAGE_SIZE) != PAGE_SIZE)
+                       goto err_with_unmap;
Sashiko is right, even though this is benign for now. `ret` is still 0
from the `kvm_pgtable_get_leaf()` above, so a short unmap runs the
rollback and returns success. Could it set an error before the goto?

...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1161,13 +1161,12 @@ static int stage2_unmap_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
        kvm_pte_t *childp = NULL;
        bool need_flush = false;

-       if (!kvm_pte_valid(ctx->old)) {
-               if (stage2_pte_is_counted(ctx->old)) {
-                       kvm_clear_pte(ctx->ptep);
-                       mm_ops->put_page(ctx->ptep);
-               }
+       /*
+        * That also ignores stage2_pte_is_counted() instead of clearing
+        * the PTE as the MMIO can be owned by the hypervisor.
+        */
+       if (!kvm_pte_valid(ctx->old))
                return 0;
-       }
This changes `kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap()` for every caller, for a
reason specific to `host_stage2_unmap_dev_all()`. The others are
`__unmap_stage2_range()` and the two guest unmaps in `mem_protect.c`;
as far as I can tell none is affected today, but
`stage2_pte_is_counted()`'s comment still describes the old behaviour.

What's changing isn't what the walk does, it's what counts as a
counted entry, and that isn't the same question for the host stage-2
as for a guest's. Could that be stated at the call site instead?

I couldn't work out what "That" refers to in the new comment.

Cheers,
/fuad

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260908110713.1540304-1-fuad.tabba@linux.dev/ (local)
        if (kvm_pte_table(ctx->old, ctx->level)) {
                childp = kvm_pte_follow(ctx->old, mm_ops);
--
2.55.0.654.g21b8a5bc05-goog
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help