On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 11:50:37 -0700
Borislav Petkov [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 05, 2026 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
quoted
quoted
That's for "not getting any answers" which is not the case here.
No, that's the case ALWAYS. If you spam maintainers with too often
submissions, you end up achieving the opposite to what you're trying to do.
This particular set was sent too fast, I agree, but reading that document again, it
sounds like the summary is being patient with busy people.
Some subsystems even discourage waiting in such cases:
e.g.
https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html
"Do not wait too long (weeks) between postings either as it will make it
harder for reviewers to recall all the context."
[...]
quoted
But if the main maintainers (which is a bit harder to say in this series) found
time to review, than IMHO (also seen from my maintainer perspective), improve
as soon as you find time and submit the improved version.
If you want an earlier submission, feel free to ask the person.
In the general case, though, one should do a good testing before submitting
and all the issues caught after that, one can work in in her/his next version
locally and perhaps even state so.
Hmm, maybe I was misunderstood. Just to avoid that I accidentially provoke
patch-flooding with my comments:
The next revision should come only after you have finished your homework
(improve according to review comments, tests,...) and any further review
comments are unlikely.
Regards,
Andreas