Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2026, 19:08:02 Ostafrikanische Zeit schrieb Conor 
Dooley:

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 11:26:21PM +0300, Stefan Dösinger wrote:

quoted

+F:	Documentation/devicetree/zte,zx297520v3-*

Sashiko complaint here looks valid.

Yes, it is valid.

It also brought up another concern in patch 12 that has an impact on this 
binding:

Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2026, 23:42:19 Ostafrikanische Zeit schrieb sashiko-
bot@kernel.org:

issue(s) to consider: - [Low] The `syscon-reboot` node is incorrectly
defined at the root level using the explicitly deprecated `regmap`
property. --

And indeed "regmap" is deprecated and I missed it somehow. As far as I 
understand, to put syscon-reboot as a child of the clock, I need to add the 
simple-mfd .compatible:

Either

topclk: clock-controller@13b000 {
	compatible = "zte,zx297520v3-topclk", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
	reg = <0x0013b000 0x400>;
	...
	syscon-reboot {
		compatible = "syscon-reboot";
		regmap = <&topclk>;
		offset = <0x0>;
		mask = <0x1>;
	};
};

--- or ---

something@13b000 {
	compatible = "zte,zx297520v3-topcrm", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
	reg = <0x0013b000 0x400>;
	ranges;

	topclk: clock-controller@0 {
		compatible = "zte,zx297520v3-topclk";
		...
	}

	syscon-reboot {
		compatible = "syscon-reboot";
		offset = <0x0>;
		mask = <0x1>;
	};
};

I see both ways in existing DTS files (e.g. imx6sl.dtsi for the fomer, 
uniphier-pro4.dtsi for the latter). Is there a preferred way? I have a mild 
preference for the first, as it would keep all 3 clocks in the same way. If I 
go for the second, the clock driver would have to query its own node and the 
parent node for the regmap.

AFAIU unrelated to syscon-reboot option 2 would give me the opportunity to 
have separate clock and reset nodes and bindings and skip the aux bus, but 
this would not be a correct representation of how the hardware works.