Re: [RFC PATCH 00/20] mshv: enable kexec with Hyper-V donated pages and partitions
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Date: 2026-06-01 15:06:29
Also in:
kexec, linux-hyperv, linux-mm, lkml
On 05-31 20:10, Mike Rapoport wrote:
Hi Jork, Only had time to skim through the patches. I have a couple of high level questions for now. On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 05:41:42PM -0700, Jork Loeser wrote:quoted
When Linux runs as an L1 Virtual Host (L1VH) under Hyper-V, the MSHV root partition driver deposits pages to the hypervisor and creates partitions for guest VMs. Prior patches enabled kexec for L1VH, but only when no partitions had been created and no memory had been donated. This series lifts that limitation. It uses KHO (Kexec Handover) to: - Track all pages deposited to the hypervisor in a KHO radix tree and preserve them across kexec so the new kernel knows which pages are owned by the hypervisor. - Freeze running partitions before kexec, record their IDs in the KHO FDT, and vacuum (tear down + reclaim memory) stale partitions after kexec. - In case of a crash, exclude hypervisor-owned pages from crash dump collection by passing the radix tree root PA via Hyper-V crash MSR P2 to the crash kernel. Dependency on Pratyush's KHO series =================================== Patches 1-12 are cherry-picked from Pratyush Yadav's v1 series "kho: make boot time huge page allocation work nicely with KHO" [1], which is still under discussion. This series uses functionality from those patches -- specifically the meta-data page enumeration via table callbacks and the restructured radix tree API. It also extends the KHO radix tree with: - A freeze mechanism to lock the tree before serializing for kexec (patch 13).There were a lot of effort to make KHO stateless and drop the requirement for finalization/freeze.
Yes, using KHO directly here is incorrect. The state machine is provided by LUO, so we should use LUO here. MSHV should provide a file that userspace adds to LUO, and all state machine management would be the same as for all other clients participating in LU.
Why is this necessary to add a freeze mechanism to kho_radix_tree? If it's a hard requirement of mshv maybe the freeze part should be handled there?
j
quoted
- A crash-kernel-safe variant that memremaps radix nodes for use outside the direct map (patch 14). Patch overview ============== Patches 1-12: KHO radix tree and memblock changes (from [1]) Patch 13: Radix tree freeze and del_key() error reportingdel_key() error reporting sounds like something we'd want to avoid. del_key() is called on "freeing" path and during error handling, it would be hard if at all possible to deal with errors from del_key().quoted
Patch 14: Crash-kernel-safe radix tree presence check Patch 15: Page tracker using KHO radix tree for deposited pages Patch 16: Debugfs interface for page tracker Patches 17-18: Crash MSR reshuffling + crash dump page exclusion Patch 19: Export kexec_in_progress for modulesIsn't there another way to differentiate kexec reboot?quoted
Patch 20: Freeze and vacuum partitions across kexec Feedback ======== This is an RFC. I am looking for feedback on the overall approach as well as the KHO changes (patches 13-14). [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260429133928.850721-1-pratyush@kernel.org/ (local) Based-on: linux-next/master (next-20260527)-- Sincerely yours, Mike.