Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: mxs: manually reset phy regs after a warm reset
From: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
Date: 2026-03-31 02:07:55
Also in:
imx, linux-usb, lkml
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 04:19:24PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 05:31:33PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote:quoted
The usb phy registers are not fully reset on warm reset under stress conditions. We need to manually reset those (CTRL, PWD, DEBUG, PLL_SIC) regs after a warm reset. This will reset DEBUG and PLL_SIC registers. CTRL and PWD register are handled by "SFT" bit in stmp_reset_block(). ERR051269: USB PHY registers not fully resetting on warm reset under stress conditions The following USB PHY registers must be written by SW to restore the reset value after a warm reset: Reg: ctrl Addr: 0x29910030 Data: 0xc000_0000 Reg: pwd Addr: 0x29910000 Data: 0x001e_1c00 Reg: debug0 Addr: 0x29910050 Data: 0x7f18_0000 Reg: pll_sic Addr: 0x299100a0 Data: 0x00d1_2000 Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com> --- drivers/usb/phy/phy-mxs-usb.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-mxs-usb.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-mxs-usb.c index 7069dd3f4d0d..dd42db8a0829 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-mxs-usb.c +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-mxs-usb.c@@ -209,6 +209,9 @@ static const struct mxs_phy_data imx6ul_phy_data = { static const struct mxs_phy_data imx7ulp_phy_data = { }; +static const struct mxs_phy_data imx8ulp_phy_data = { +}; + static const struct of_device_id mxs_phy_dt_ids[] = { { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-usbphy", .data = &imx6sx_phy_data, }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sl-usbphy", .data = &imx6sl_phy_data, },@@ -217,6 +220,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id mxs_phy_dt_ids[] = { { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-usbphy", .data = &vf610_phy_data, }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx6ul-usbphy", .data = &imx6ul_phy_data, }, { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-usbphy", .data = &imx7ulp_phy_data, }, + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-usbphy", .data = &imx8ulp_phy_data, },Why can't you use &imx7ulp_phy_data here as it's all just empty?
Thanks for your review. Because it's imx8ulp specific errata. Let me add more info in the commit message. Thanks, Xu Yang