Re: (subset) [PATCH v17 0/8] support FEAT_LSUI
From: Yeoreum Yun <hidden>
Date: 2026-03-27 13:56:16
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-kselftest, lkml
From: Yeoreum Yun <hidden>
Date: 2026-03-27 13:56:16
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-kselftest, lkml
Hi Catalin,
On Sat, 14 Mar 2026 17:51:25 +0000, Yeoreum Yun wrote:quoted
Since Armv9.6, FEAT_LSUI supplies the load/store instructions for previleged level to access to access user memory without clearing PSTATE.PAN bit. This patchset support FEAT_LSUI and applies it mainly in futex atomic operation and others. [...]Applied to arm64 (for-next/feat_lsui), thanks!
Thanks!
I decided to drop patch [6/8] (arm64: armv8_deprecated: disable swp emulation when FEAT_LSUI present). The way FEAT_LSUI support looks now, we still have uaccess_enable_privileged() working properly and we could even support SWP emulation using exclusives. While it's highly unlikely to see both 32-bit EL0 and FEAT_LSUI in practice,
This is one of decisive reason to drop the swp emulation with LSUI (https://lore.kernel.org/all/aXDbBKhE1SdCW6q4@willie-the-truck/ (local)) However,
models may support the combination and disabling SWP emulation feels pretty artificial.
But I'm not sure this is a sufficient rationale for supporting SWP with LSUI, since it's highly unlikely to encounter a real CPU that supports both 32-bit EL0 and FEAT_LSUI. Anyway, it's fair enough to drop 6/8 right now. But I appreciate whether it would be good to support SWP emulation with LSUI so that let me respin for it with the former patch. [...] -- Sincerely, Yeoreum Yun