On 3/23/2026 3:27 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

EXTERNAL EMAIL

On 23/03/2026 03:09, Jun Guo wrote:

quoted

Hi Krzysztof,

On 3/20/2026 6:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

EXTERNAL EMAIL

On 20/03/2026 10:58, Peter Chen wrote:

quoted

On 26-03-20 10:43:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

EXTERNAL EMAIL

On 20/03/2026 10:38, Peter Chen wrote:

quoted

On 26-03-20 10:12:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

EXTERNAL EMAIL

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 06:17:21PM +0800, Jun Guo wrote:

quoted

Update the DMA-350 DT binding to match the current driver behavior.

Allow both:
- "arm,dma-350" as the generic compatible, and
- "cix,sky1-dma-350", "arm,dma-350" for SoC-specific fallback usage.

Also document interrupt topology variants supported by hardware
integration:
- one combined interrupt for all channels, or
- one interrupt per channel (up to 8 channels).

This patch is Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex.

Wrong tag, please read carefully the guideline before using LLM tools.

Hi Krzysztof,

It is the trade off for coding-assistants.rst suggestion and
passing checkpatch.pl. Currently, checkpatch.pl reports the
error for tag without email address. So we choose to add tag
description at patch context.

You still have to use correct tag.

You mean even checkpatch.pl reports below error, we still add it
"Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex" as tag?

Yes, after fixing the contents (that's not entirely correct format I
think). Hopefully someone will fix checkpatch one day...

I cannot find any commit records referencing AI via "Co-developed-by" in
the latest kernel GitHub repository, and I also cannot locate any text
describing the correct way to cite AI in the submitting-patches.rst
file. In this case, how can I confirm the current correct format?

If you do not want to read coding with assistant guideline and follow
its words, then please don't send code created with such tools. Do you
even have full copyrights to send it here? What license was used by the
tool to generate you this code?

Sorry, I overlooked the programming assistant guidelines. I will comply 
with the requirements of the programming assistant guidelines and 
resubmit a new patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Best regards,
Jun