Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/rcar-du: Use drm_gem_dma_get_sg_table() helper to get scatter gather table
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-03-18 16:22:03
Also in:
asahi, dri-devel, lkml
On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 12:02 AM Laurent Pinchart [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Chen-Yu, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 02:40:43PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:quoted
The rcar-du driver is directly calling dma_get_sgtable() on a drm_gem_dma_object. Not passing the dma_attrs field in may cause problems when DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING is added to the GEM DMA helpers gain support later. Instead, use the drm_gem_dma_get_sg_table() helper to get the scatter gather table. Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> --- Changes since v1: - new patch Not sure if we should add a helper like drm_fb_dma_get_gem_addr(). This seems to be the only driver that is using a scatter gather table to pass DMA addresses.The DU can't access memory directly (at least on Gen3 and newer), and goes through a separate device called VSP that acts as an external DMA engine (*) and compositor. This is why buffers need to be mapped manually to the VSP, the GEM helpers would otherwise use the DU struct device, which isn't correct. I can't use drm_device.dma_dev as the DMA initiator can be different per CRTC. I don't think a separate helper with a single user would be very useful here, especially given that part of the logic in drm_fb_dma_get_gem_addr() is in the separate vsp1 driver. Refactoring may get messy, for little benefit. * And in some cases the VSP further delegates memory access to the FCP, which is yet another DMA initiator from an IOMMU point of view.
I see. That's probably the most complicated hardware I've seen so far.
quoted
--- drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c index 94c22d2db197..6a62608ee3a9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c@@ -291,10 +291,16 @@ int rcar_du_vsp_map_fb(struct rcar_du_vsp *vsp, struct drm_framebuffer *fb, dst = sg_next(dst); } } else { - ret = dma_get_sgtable(rcdu->dev, sgt, gem->vaddr, - gem->dma_addr, gem->base.size);Did you compile the patch ? The rcdu variable is now unused. Apart from that, it compiles fine and seems to operate as expected.
I probably missed it in the logs. Thanks for catching it.
quoted
- if (ret) + struct sg_table *ret_sgt; + + ret_sgt = drm_gem_dma_get_sg_table(gem); + if (IS_ERR(ret_sgt)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(ret_sgt); goto fail; + } + + memcpy(sgt, ret_sgt, sizeof(*sgt)); + kfree(ret_sgt);It's a bit of a shame to kmalloc() a new sg_table and free it right after :-/ Would it be that bad to switch to dma_get_sgtable_attrs() here, and pass gem->dma_attrs to the function ?
That's another option. I was trying to isolate the DMA API calls to just the GEM DMA helpers, but as you said, it's a bit wasteful. I'll just switch to dma_get_sgtable_attrs() and squash the change into the other dma_*_attrs() conversion patch. Thanks ChenYu
quoted
} ret = vsp1_du_map_sg(vsp->vsp, sgt);-- Regards, Laurent Pinchart