Hello David,
On 3/16/2026 5:22 PM, David Laight wrote:
quoted
The current scheme to directly patch the kernel text for runtime
constants runs into the following issue with futex adapted to using
runtime constants on arm64:
Doesn't this need to come before the previous patch?
My rationale was that this didn't make a difference until
the final futex changes so I didn't pay much attention to
how they were ordered.
I will rearrange these the other way around in the next
version to keep this independent of introduction of
runtime_const_mask_32().
Thank you again for taking a look at the series.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek