On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 03:09:48PM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:

The RK3588 MIPI CSI-2 receivers are compatible to the ones found in
the RK3568. However, their integration in the respective SoC may be
different when it comes to the (currently not implemented) split

All this says they are compatible, so express it.

DPHY feature. Therefore, add the RK3588 compatible to allow for
future differentiation.

This I do not understand. If you just copy standard rules from
writing-bindings, then no, don't do that. It's obvious and there is
never a need to repeat any standard/common rule. If you want to say
devices are not compatible, then say that explicitly.

Best regards,
Krzysztof