Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64/mm: contpte-sized exec folios for 16K and 64K pages
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Date: 2026-03-13 16:33:50
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On 10/03/2026 14:51, Usama Arif wrote:
On arm64, the contpte hardware feature coalesces multiple contiguous PTEs into a single iTLB entry, reducing iTLB pressure for large executable mappings. exec_folio_order() was introduced [1] to request readahead at an arch-preferred folio order for executable memory, enabling contpte mapping on the fault path. However, several things prevent this from working optimally on 16K and 64K page configurations: 1. exec_folio_order() returns ilog2(SZ_64K >> PAGE_SHIFT), which only produces the optimal contpte order for 4K pages. For 16K pages it returns order 2 (64K) instead of order 7 (2M), and for 64K pages it returns order 0 (64K) instead of order 5 (2M).
This was deliberate, although perhaps a bit conservative. I was concerned about the possibility of read amplification; pointlessly reading in a load of memory that never actually gets used. And that is independent of page size. 2M seems quite big as a default IMHO, I could imagine Android might complain about memory pressure in their 16K config, for example. Additionally, ELF files are normally only aligned to 64K and you can only get the TLB benefits if the memory is aligned in physical and virtual memory.
Patch 1 fixes this by
using ilog2(CONT_PTES) which evaluates to the optimal order for all
page sizes.
2. Even with the optimal order, the mmap_miss heuristic in
do_sync_mmap_readahead() silently disables exec readahead after 100
page faults. The mmap_miss counter tracks whether readahead is useful
for mmap'd file access:
- Incremented by 1 in do_sync_mmap_readahead() on every page cache
miss (page needed IO).
- Decremented by N in filemap_map_pages() for N pages successfully
mapped via fault-around (pages found in cache without faulting,
evidence that readahead was useful). Only non-workingset pages
count and recently evicted and re-read pages don't count as hits.
- Decremented by 1 in do_async_mmap_readahead() when a PG_readahead
marker page is found (indicates sequential consumption of readahead
pages).
When mmap_miss exceeds MMAP_LOTSAMISS (100), all readahead is
disabled. On 64K pages, both decrement paths are inactive:
- filemap_map_pages() is never called because fault_around_pages
(65536 >> PAGE_SHIFT = 1) disables should_fault_around(), which
requires fault_around_pages > 1. With only 1 page in the
fault-around window, there is nothing "around" to map.
- do_async_mmap_readahead() never fires for exec mappings because
exec readahead sets async_size = 0, so no PG_readahead markers
are placed.
With no decrements, mmap_miss monotonically increases past
MMAP_LOTSAMISS after 100 faults, disabling exec readahead
for the remainder of the mapping.
Patch 2 fixes this by moving the VM_EXEC readahead block
above the mmap_miss check, since exec readahead is targeted (one
folio at the fault location, async_size=0) not speculative prefetch.Interesting!
3. Even with correct folio order and readahead, contpte mapping requires the virtual address to be aligned to CONT_PTE_SIZE (2M on 64K pages). The readahead path aligns file offsets and the buddy allocator aligns physical memory, but the virtual address depends on the VMA start. For PIE binaries, ASLR randomizes the load address at PAGE_SIZE (64K) granularity, giving only a 1/32 chance of 2M alignment. When misaligned, contpte_set_ptes() never sets the contiguous PTE bit for any folio in the VMA, resulting in zero iTLB coalescing benefit. Patch 3 fixes this for the main binary by bumping the ELF loader's alignment to PAGE_SIZE << exec_folio_order() for ET_DYN binaries. Patch 4 fixes this for shared libraries by adding a contpte-size alignment fallback in thp_get_unmapped_area_vmflags(). The existing PMD_SIZE alignment (512M on 64K pages) is too large for typical shared libraries, so this smaller fallback (2M) succeeds where PMD fails.
I don't see how you can reliably influence this from the kernel? The ELF file alignment is, by default, 64K (16K on Android) and there is no guarrantee that the text section is the first section in the file. You need to align the start of the text section to the 2M boundary and to do that, you'll need to align the start of the file to some 64K boundary at a specific offset to the 2M boundary, based on the size of any sections before the text section. That's a job for the dynamic loader I think? Perhaps I've misunderstood what you're doing...
I created a benchmark that mmaps a large executable file and calls RET-stub functions at PAGE_SIZE offsets across it. "Cold" measures fault + readahead cost. "Random" first faults in all pages with a sequential sweep (not measured), then measures time for calling random offsets, isolating iTLB miss cost for scattered execution. The benchmark results on Neoverse V2 (Grace), arm64 with 64K base pages, 512MB executable file on ext4, averaged over 3 runs: Phase | Baseline | Patched | Improvement -----------|--------------|--------------|------------------ Cold fault | 83.4 ms | 41.3 ms | 50% faster Random | 76.0 ms | 58.3 ms | 23% faster
I think the proper way to do this is to link the text section with 2M alignment and have the dynamic linker mark the region with MADV_HUGEPAGE? Thanks, Ryan
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250430145920.3748738-6-ryan.roberts@arm.com/ (local) Usama Arif (4): arm64: request contpte-sized folios for exec memory mm: bypass mmap_miss heuristic for VM_EXEC readahead elf: align ET_DYN base to exec folio order for contpte mapping mm: align file-backed mmap to exec folio order in thp_get_unmapped_area arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 9 ++-- fs/binfmt_elf.c | 15 +++++++ mm/filemap.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++--------------- mm/huge_memory.c | 17 ++++++++ 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)