Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 3 authors, 2026-02-25

Re: [PATCH 17/17] Add standalone crypto kernel module technical documentation

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2026-02-25 14:09:01
Also in: linux-crypto, linux-kbuild, linux-modules

On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 05:55:17PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
Let's be clear: this is possible only when the kernel has a stable ABI
to the crypto module, which realistically isn't something that is going
to be supported upstream.  The Linux kernel is well-known for not
maintaining a stable in-kernel ABI, for good reasons.

So, the only case where this feature would have a benefit over the
kernel's existing approach to FIPS 140 is in downstream kernels that
maintain a stable in-kernel ABI.  There would be no benefit to direct
users of the mainline kernel or even the stable release series.

For this to be considered for upstream there would need to be some level
of consensus in the community to support this feature despite this.
That's a very nice way to say this goes against all the established
principles for kernel development.

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help