On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 08:32:16AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 02:38:54PM +0100, Ciprian Costea wrote:

quoted

From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>

Add device tree binding documentation for the NXP S32N79 automotive SoC
and the S32N79 Reference Design Board (S32N79-RDB).

The S32N79 is an automotive-grade SoC featuring eight ARM Cortex-A78AE
cores organized for high-performance networking and gateway applications
in vehicles.

Co-developed-by: Larisa Grigore <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Larisa Grigore <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
index 5716d701292c..415081423a30 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml

@@ -1827,6 +1827,12 @@ properties:
               - fsl,s32v234-evb           # S32V234-EVB2 Customer Evaluation Board
           - const: fsl,s32v234

+      - description: S32N79 based Boards
+        items:
+          - enum:
+              - nxp,s32n79-rdb
+          - const: nxp,s32n79

I believe these are ordered by fallback, so s32v > s32n.

Previous use fsl,s32v234, now use nxp,s32n79, I suggest keep consistent
with existing one, use fsl,s32n79

Frank

quoted

+
       - description: Traverse LS1088A based Boards
         items:
           - enum:
--
2.43.0