Re: [PATCH v6 42/44] KVM: VMX: Dedup code for adding MSR to VMCS's auto list
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-02-20 19:14:52
Also in:
kvm, kvm-riscv, kvmarm, linux-perf-users, linux-riscv, lkml, loongarch
On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 08:46:07AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026, Namhyung Kim wrote:quoted
Hello, On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 04:17:18PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:quoted
Add a helper to add an MSR to a VMCS's "auto" list to deduplicate the code in add_atomic_switch_msr(), and so that the functionality can be used in the future for managing the MSR auto-store list. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index 018e01daab68..3f64d4b1b19c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c@@ -1093,12 +1093,28 @@ static __always_inline void add_atomic_switch_msr_special(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, vm_exit_controls_setbit(vmx, exit); } +static void vmx_add_auto_msr(struct vmx_msrs *m, u32 msr, u64 value, + unsigned long vmcs_count_field, struct kvm *kvm) +{ + int i; + + i = vmx_find_loadstore_msr_slot(m, msr); + if (i < 0) { + if (KVM_BUG_ON(m->nr == MAX_NR_LOADSTORE_MSRS, kvm)) + return; + + i = m->nr++; + m->val[i].index = msr; + vmcs_write32(vmcs_count_field, m->nr); + } + m->val[i].value = value; +} + static void add_atomic_switch_msr(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, unsigned msr, u64 guest_val, u64 host_val) { struct msr_autoload *m = &vmx->msr_autoload; struct kvm *kvm = vmx->vcpu.kvm; - int i; switch (msr) { case MSR_EFER:@@ -1132,27 +1148,8 @@ static void add_atomic_switch_msr(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, unsigned msr, wrmsrq(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, 0); } - i = vmx_find_loadstore_msr_slot(&m->guest, msr); - if (i < 0) { - if (KVM_BUG_ON(m->guest.nr == MAX_NR_LOADSTORE_MSRS, kvm)) - return; - - i = m->guest.nr++; - m->guest.val[i].index = msr; - vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_MSR_LOAD_COUNT, m->guest.nr); - } - m->guest.val[i].value = guest_val; - - i = vmx_find_loadstore_msr_slot(&m->host, msr); - if (i < 0) { - if (KVM_BUG_ON(m->host.nr == MAX_NR_LOADSTORE_MSRS, kvm)) - return; - - i = m->host.nr++; - m->host.val[i].index = msr; - vmcs_write32(VM_EXIT_MSR_LOAD_COUNT, m->host.nr); - } - m->host.val[i].value = host_val; + vmx_add_auto_msr(&m->guest, msr, guest_val, VM_ENTRY_MSR_LOAD_COUNT, kvm); + vmx_add_auto_msr(&m->guest, msr, host_val, VM_EXIT_MSR_LOAD_COUNT, kvm);Shouldn't it be &m->host for the host_val?Ouch. Yes. How on earth did this escape testing... Ah, because in practice only MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE goes through the load lists, and the VM-Entry load list will use the guest's value due to VM_ENTRY_MSR_LOAD_COUNT not covering the bad host value. Did you happen to run into problems when using PEBS events in the host?
No, I just found it by reading the patch.
Regardless, do you want to send a patch? Either way, I'll figure out a way to verify the bug and the fix.
Sure, will do. Thanks, Namhyung