Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] PCI: dwc: ep: Expose integrated eDMA resources via EPC aux-resource API
From: Koichiro Den <hidden>
Date: 2026-02-16 15:06:10
Also in:
linux-pci, linux-rockchip, lkml
On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 03:12:53PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 01:38:43AM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:quoted
Implement the EPC aux-resource API for DesignWare endpoint controllers with integrated eDMA. Report: - DMA controller MMIO window (PCI_EPC_AUX_DMA_CTRL_MMIO) - interrupt-emulation doorbell register (PCI_EPC_AUX_DOORBELL_MMIO), including its Linux IRQ - per-channel LL descriptor regions (PCI_EPC_AUX_DMA_CHAN_DESC) If the DMA controller MMIO window is already exposed via a platform-owned fixed BAR subregion, also provide the BAR number and offset so EPF drivers can reuse it without reprogramming the BAR. Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <redacted> --- .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 149 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c index 7e7844ff0f7e..ffd2797b7b81 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c@@ -808,6 +808,154 @@ dw_pcie_ep_get_features(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no) return ep->ops->get_features(ep); } +static const struct pci_epc_bar_rsvd_region * +dw_pcie_ep_find_bar_rsvd_region(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, + enum pci_epc_bar_rsvd_region_type type, + enum pci_barno *bar, + resource_size_t *bar_offset) +{ + const struct pci_epc_features *features; + const struct pci_epc_bar_desc *bar_desc; + const struct pci_epc_bar_rsvd_region *r; + int i, j; + + if (!ep->ops->get_features) + return NULL; + + features = ep->ops->get_features(ep); + if (!features) + return NULL; + + for (i = BAR_0; i <= BAR_5; i++) { + bar_desc = &features->bar[i]; + + if (!bar_desc->nr_rsvd_regions || !bar_desc->rsvd_regions) + continue; + + for (j = 0; j < bar_desc->nr_rsvd_regions; j++) { + r = &bar_desc->rsvd_regions[j]; + + if (r->type != type) + continue; + + if (bar) + *bar = i; + if (bar_offset) + *bar_offset = r->offset; + return r; + } + } + + return NULL; +} + +static int +dw_pcie_ep_get_aux_resources(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no, + struct pci_epc_aux_resource *resources, + int num_resources) +{ + struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc); + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); + const struct pci_epc_bar_rsvd_region *rsvd; + struct dw_edma_chip *edma = &pci->edma; + enum pci_barno dma_ctrl_bar = NO_BAR; + int ll_cnt = 0, needed, idx = 0; + resource_size_t db_offset = edma->db_offset; + resource_size_t dma_ctrl_bar_offset = 0; + resource_size_t dma_reg_size; + unsigned int i; + + if (!pci->edma_reg_size) + return 0; + + dma_reg_size = pci->edma_reg_size; + + for (i = 0; i < edma->ll_wr_cnt; i++) + if (edma->ll_region_wr[i].sz) + ll_cnt++; + + for (i = 0; i < edma->ll_rd_cnt; i++) + if (edma->ll_region_rd[i].sz) + ll_cnt++; + + needed = 1 + ll_cnt + (db_offset != ~0 ? 1 : 0); + + /* Count query mode */ + if (!resources || !num_resources) + return needed; + + if (num_resources < needed) + return -ENOSPC; + + rsvd = dw_pcie_ep_find_bar_rsvd_region(ep, + PCI_EPC_BAR_RSVD_DMA_CTRL_MMIO, + &dma_ctrl_bar, + &dma_ctrl_bar_offset); + if (rsvd && rsvd->size < dma_reg_size) + dma_reg_size = rsvd->size; + + /* DMA register block */ + resources[idx++] = (struct pci_epc_aux_resource) { + .type = PCI_EPC_AUX_DMA_CTRL_MMIO, + .phys_addr = pci->edma_reg_phys, + .size = dma_reg_size, + .bar = dma_ctrl_bar, + .bar_offset = dma_ctrl_bar_offset, + }; + + /* + * For interrupt-emulation doorbells, report a standalone resource + * instead of bundling it into the DMA controller MMIO resource. + */ + if (db_offset != ~0) { + if (dma_reg_size < sizeof(u32) || + db_offset > dma_reg_size - sizeof(u32))In your other patch, you used: if (size_add(offset, sizeof(u32)) > epf->bar[bar].size) For consistency, do you perhaps want to use the same here? size_add(db_offset, sizeof(u32)) > dma_reg_size ?
db_offset and dma_reg_size are resource_size_t, not size_t. resource_size_t can
be wider than size_t on some 32-bit builds with CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT, so
using size_add() would potentially introduce a narrowing conversion. For that
reason, I avoided it.
If that would be preferable, I'm happy to switch this part to something like:
if (db_offset != ~0) {
if (range_end_overflows_t(resource_size_t, db_offset,
sizeof(u32), dma_reg_size))
return -EINVAL;
or alternatively use check_add_overflow().
Best regards,
Koichiro
Kind regards, Niklas