Re: [PATCH v12 6/7] arm64: futex: support futex with FEAT_LSUI
From: Yeoreum Yun <hidden>
Date: 2026-02-10 17:19:05
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, linux-kselftest, lkml
Hi Catalin, Thanks for your suggestion.
I wonder whether we can shorten this function a bit. Not sure it would be more readable but it would be shorter. On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 07:06:21PM +0000, Yeoreum Yun wrote:quoted
+static __always_inline int +__lsui_cmpxchg32(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 oldval, u32 newval, u32 *oval) +{ + u64 __user *uaddr64; + bool futex_on_lo; + int ret, i; + u32 other, orig_other; + union { + struct futex_on_lo { + u32 val; + u32 other; + } lo_futex; + + struct futex_on_hi { + u32 other; + u32 val; + } hi_futex; + + u64 raw; + } oval64, orig64, nval64;union { u32 futex[2]; u64 raw; }quoted
+ + uaddr64 = (u64 __user *) PTR_ALIGN_DOWN(uaddr, sizeof(u64)); + futex_on_lo = IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)uaddr, sizeof(u64));futex_pos = (unsigned long)uaddr & 4 ? 1 : 0;
Okay. I'll try.
quoted
+ + if (futex_on_lo) { + oval64.lo_futex.val = oldval; + ret = get_user(oval64.lo_futex.other, uaddr + 1); + } else { + oval64.hi_futex.val = oldval; + ret = get_user(oval64.hi_futex.other, uaddr - 1); + }and here use get_user(oval64.raw, uaddr64); futex[futex_pos] = oldval;
But there is another feedback about this (though I did first similarly with your suggestion -- use oval64.raw): https://lore.kernel.org/all/aXDZGhFQDvoSwdc_@willie-the-truck/ (local)
quoted
+ + if (ret) + return -EFAULT; + + ret = -EAGAIN; + for (i = 0; i < FUTEX_MAX_LOOPS; i++) { + orig64.raw = nval64.raw = oval64.raw; + + if (futex_on_lo) + nval64.lo_futex.val = newval; + else + nval64.hi_futex.val = newval; + + if (__lsui_cmpxchg64(uaddr64, &oval64.raw, nval64.raw)) + return -EFAULT; + + if (futex_on_lo) { + oldval = oval64.lo_futex.val; + other = oval64.lo_futex.other; + orig_other = orig64.lo_futex.other; + } else { + oldval = oval64.hi_futex.val; + other = oval64.hi_futex.other; + orig_other = orig64.hi_futex.other; + }Something similar here to use futex[futex_pos]. We probably also need to check that the user pointer is 32-bit aligned and return -EFAULT if not.
Thanks. I'll respin it again ;) -- Sincerely, Yeoreum Yun