[bug report] soc: rockchip: grf: Support multiple grf to be handled

[ Smatch checking is paused while we raise funding.  #SadFace
  https://lore.kernel.org/all/aTaiGSbWZ9DJaGo7@stanley.mountain/ (local) -dan ]

Hello Shawn Lin,

Commit 75fb63ae0312 ("soc: rockchip: grf: Support multiple grf to be
handled") from Jan 16, 2026 (linux-next), leads to the following
Smatch static checker warning:

	drivers/soc/rockchip/grf.c:249 rockchip_grf_init()
	warn: inconsistent refcounting 'np->kobj.kref.refcount.refs.counter':

drivers/soc/rockchip/grf.c
   212  static int __init rockchip_grf_init(void)
   213  {
   214          const struct rockchip_grf_info *grf_info;
   215          const struct of_device_id *match;
   216          struct device_node *np;
   217          struct regmap *grf;
   218          int ret, i;
   219  
   220          for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, rockchip_grf_dt_match, &match) {
   221                  if (!of_device_is_available(np))
   222                          continue;
   223                  if (!match || !match->data) {
   224                          pr_err("%s: missing grf data\n", __func__);
   225                          of_node_put(np);
   226                          return -EINVAL;
   227                  }
   228  
   229                  grf_info = match->data;
   230  
   231                  grf = syscon_node_to_regmap(np);
   232                  if (IS_ERR(grf)) {
   233                          pr_err("%s: could not get grf syscon\n", __func__);
   234                          return PTR_ERR(grf);

Missing of_node_put(np) before returning.

   235                  }
   236  
   237                  for (i = 0; i < grf_info->num_values; i++) {
   238                          const struct rockchip_grf_value *val = &grf_info->values[i];
   239  
   240                          pr_debug("%s: adjusting %s in %#6x to %#10x\n", __func__,
   241                                  val->desc, val->reg, val->val);
   242                          ret = regmap_write(grf, val->reg, val->val);
   243                          if (ret < 0)
   244                                  pr_err("%s: write to %#6x failed with %d\n",
   245                                          __func__, val->reg, ret);
   246                  }
   247          }
   248  
   249          return 0;
   250  }

regards,
dan carpenter