On 18/01/2026 09:03, Thierry Reding wrote:

Hi ARM SoC maintainers,

The following changes since commit 8f0b4cce4481fb22653697cced8d0d04027cb1e8:

  Linux 6.19-rc1 (2025-12-14 16:05:07 +1200)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git tags/tegra-for-6.20-dt-bindings

for you to fetch changes up to b2788f6320722d6059f849f35a77eb082608c627:

  ASoC: dt-bindings: realtek,rt5640: Document port node (2026-01-17 01:58:18 +0100)

Thanks,
Thierry

----------------------------------------------------------------
dt-bindings: Changes for v6.20-rc1

This series updates various DT bindings for Tegra architecture,
primarily focusing on schema validation fixes and new feature
documentation for Tegra234 and Tegra264 SoCs. Key changes include
correcting realtek,rt5640 audio codec bindings (adding missing ports,
clocks, and jack-detect sources), converting Tegra20 NAND bindings to
YAML, and updating memory, DMA, and IOMMU definitions for Tegra264
(introducing CMDQV and DBB clock support). Additionally, it resolves
legacy warnings for Tegra30/132 display and VI interfaces.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Ashish Mhetre (1):
      dt-bindings: iommu: Add NVIDIA Tegra CMDQV support

Charan Pedumuru (1):
      dt-bindings: mtd: nvidia,tegra20-nand: convert to DT schema

This should go via MTD. I think Miquel is not ignoring bindings.

Jon Hunter (4):
      dt-bindings: tegra: pmc: Update aotag as an optional aperture

...

      ASoC: dt-bindings: realtek,rt5640: Document mclk
      ASoC: dt-bindings: realtek,rt5640: Update jack-detect
      ASoC: dt-bindings: realtek,rt5640: Document port node

No, Mark always promptly picks up bindings patches, so I do not
understand why these are here. These should go via subsystem maintainer.

Svyatoslav Ryhel (2):
      dt-bindings: display: tegra: document Tegra132 MIPI calibration device
      dt-bindings: display: tegra: document Tegra30 VI and VIP

Thierry Reding (1):
      dt-bindings: memory: tegra: Document DBB clock for Tegra264

And this one was never publicly acknowledged that you applied it and
lead to ACTUAL warning/review comment from my side postponing your other
patch.

If you took this patch for DTS, then it must be on the DTS branch BEFORE
the DTS uses it. There is explicit rule about this in writing bindings.
You even sent it like that, look:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/176856655186.139432.6919318227218814446.b4-ty@nvidia.com/ (local)
1/3: DT binding
2/3: driver
3/3: DTS

so why a correct posting you would disorganize and break the
bisectability rule by applying binding separate?

sheetal (1):
      dt-bindings: dma: Update ADMA bindings for tegra264

Vinod also picks up such bindings. If this is for DTS then should be in
DTS branch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof