Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2026-01-16

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mm: fault: Enable interrupts before invoking __do_user_fault()

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2026-01-16 20:30:19
Also in: linux-rt-devel

On 2026-01-16 20:09:43 [+0000], Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
quoted
Oh, and, as I've said on netdev recently, I have lots of patches. I
don't have time to push all patches all the time. Those that I think
are the highest priority get the attention - so if something goes
quiet, the patches don't get progressed (because something else has
taken over.)

I haven't published these yet to my external git tree because they're
currently on top of my raw private "development" branch containing...

$ git lg origin..rmk | wc -l
473

many of those behind those I mentioned above. At some point I need to
move them to their own separate branch, or to the "misc" branch after
sending them to the mailing list... but the latter means spending time
writing a covering message summarising the changes, and the key thing
is "time".

I've wasted almost all of today running a bisect for a stmmac issue that
takes out my _entire_ network at home. It's wasted because what I
thought was a good commit turns out, on re-testing, to have been bad,
and right now I have no idea what a good commit is, and whether that
even exists before the platform support was merged.
Sorry for a third reply... yesterday I started at about 10am, finished
at 2am last night chasing a different stmmac regression.

Yea, if there was more time, then I could push all the patches I have,
but I don't, and the above patches were generated back when we were
discussing the issue last time.
No worries. Is your tree rmk tree public so I could pull those and test?
Do you want me to review any of those?

Sebastian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help