Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mm: fault: Enable interrupts before invoking __do_user_fault()
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2026-01-16 20:30:19
Also in:
linux-rt-devel
On 2026-01-16 20:09:43 [+0000], Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
quoted
Oh, and, as I've said on netdev recently, I have lots of patches. I don't have time to push all patches all the time. Those that I think are the highest priority get the attention - so if something goes quiet, the patches don't get progressed (because something else has taken over.) I haven't published these yet to my external git tree because they're currently on top of my raw private "development" branch containing... $ git lg origin..rmk | wc -l 473 many of those behind those I mentioned above. At some point I need to move them to their own separate branch, or to the "misc" branch after sending them to the mailing list... but the latter means spending time writing a covering message summarising the changes, and the key thing is "time". I've wasted almost all of today running a bisect for a stmmac issue that takes out my _entire_ network at home. It's wasted because what I thought was a good commit turns out, on re-testing, to have been bad, and right now I have no idea what a good commit is, and whether that even exists before the platform support was merged.Sorry for a third reply... yesterday I started at about 10am, finished at 2am last night chasing a different stmmac regression. Yea, if there was more time, then I could push all the patches I have, but I don't, and the above patches were generated back when we were discussing the issue last time.
No worries. Is your tree rmk tree public so I could pull those and test? Do you want me to review any of those? Sebastian