On Jan 16, 2026 at 10:16:08 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 16/01/2026 10:01, Dhruva Gole wrote:

quoted

Add AM62L3 SoC to the dt-platdev blocklist to ensure proper handling
of CPUFreq functionality. The AM62L3 will use its native TI CPUFreq
driver implementation instead of the generic dt-platdev driver.

This follows the same pattern as other TI SoCs like AM62A7, AM62D2,
and AM62P5 which have been previously added to this blocklist.

Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <redacted>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
index 1708179b2610bca6035d10f0f4766eee6f73912e..29122bac2e22f6e7a8e8294cc01923c8a13d53c1 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c

@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "ti,am62a7", },
 	{ .compatible = "ti,am62d2", },
 	{ .compatible = "ti,am62p5", },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,am62l3", },

p > l

Fair point, I thought more from a "latest SOC" point of view but the
standard here is alphabetical, will re-spin.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole
Texas Instruments Incorporated